NEW SITE LAUNCH

Hey Guys, we have a new site at http://british-nationalist.org.uk/

Diversity: What it means to Britain

“I’m proud of Britain’s tolerance, diversity is what makes this country great” - Is a line you will often witness spilling from the mouths of British politicians, the liberal press and increasingly younger indigenous youths. Cultural diversity isn’t new to the UK, prior to the arrival of the commonwealth immigrants in 1948 the country had its own unique set of cultures; Scots, Welsh, English, Irish, Cornish and so on.

The multicultural ideology states that multiple communities can or do live in relative harmony, however, even before forcing alien communities into an ever decreasing space, friction between neighbouring indigenous cultures was evident, for example on the English - Welsh border pubs would have signs reading “No Dogs, No Welshman” up until a few decades ago. The difference between now and then is that the people generally shared ethnicity, religion and a common language which served as a social cement. The same bonds that had held the nation together in the face of impending invasion during WW2.

The same belief recently led British officials to place Romanian gypsies in Belfast, an error so stupid it’s almost unbelievable.

Steadily over the 50’s to 80’s successive waves of immigrants arrived on British soil, with every decade marred by small incidents or full scale riots. The government had not learned the lessons of history - race riots had scarred the Cardiff docklands as early as 1911 when bosses tried to replace the local workforce with cheaper Chinese Labourers.

Recently the sources of mass immigration widened to beyond former commonwealth nations to include practically the entire world, citizens belonging to enemy nations included (we have been at war for 8 of labours 12 years in office). One is reminded of a disastrous decision that eventually lead to the fall of Rome – Despite raiding the Empire for over a century, 200,000 terrified Visigoths pleaded entry onto Roman land, they were fleeing the westward moving Huns. Permission was granted for the refugee Goths to settle, within two years they had rebelled, decimated a Roman army and demanded their own land in Greece, Emperor Theodosius attempted to appease the barbarians by granting them their demands. Despite a bribe paid in gold, the Goths unopposed, eventually sacked the Imperial city in 410AD.

The modern day equivalent is allowing and encouraging Muslim mass immigration, how long before those already here demand their own piece of land, a Muslim state within Britain?

The United Kingdom’s major cities became Super Diverse. In the case of the UK an area is said to be super diverse when its population consists of more than 3 groups – Indigenous, Afro-Caribbean and Asian. This transformation didn’t happen overnight or even a few years. It took two decades of lax border control, with the last 12 years of Labour encouraging an unprecedented scale of mass immigration never before seen on these isles in such a short space of time.

Britain’s Top Super Diverse Areas

1.) London – Over 300 languages, 50 ethnic communities with populations of 10,000 or more. It is now considered the most diverse city in human history. Colonisation level at 30% and growing.
2.) West Midlands – Over 50 languages, 23 ethnic communities, colonisation level at 14%
3.) South East – 40 Languages, Colonisation level at 12%
4.) North West – 35 Languages, Colonisation level at 11%
5.) Yorkshire and Humberside – 22 languages, Colonisation level at 10%


The taxpayer burden of the governments enforced diversity policy is so grotesquely huge that it’s almost incalculable, translation costs alone total £50 million for 2008/09 Trevor Phillip’s race Gestapo is funded to the tune of £70 million.

The social deficits are as numerous as they are terrifying - espoused with super diversity Labour has managed to import several ‘life enriching’ customs and diseases, including; African tribal warfare, Voodoo ritual killing, honour killings, TB, AIDS, extremist Islamic clerics, incompetent foreign doctors, sex slavery, female circumcision, Halal Slaughter, winter festivals (formerly known as Christmas) and gang rape.

We are often ordered to weigh these alien customs against the culinary benefits of mass immigration, kebabs, curries and fast food outlets. Such a compelling argument. We - the people who invented the jet engine - are incapable of producing curried meat?

Some claim that Britain deserves to be colonised because of our Imperial past, usually citing India as an example, the difference is in the numbers - In 1901 there were 169,677 ethnic Brits living in India, they made up only 0.0007% of a total population of 238 million souls. It is estimated that there are 3.8 million ethnic Indians in the UK, around 6.2% of the population, not ten, not twenty, but 8,857 times the British colonisation of India.

You may think 6.2% is a small figure, however, their registration to vote is on a par, if not higher than amongst the indigenous population, when voter turnout is analysed by ethnicity the 6.2% becomes a far higher percentage of the total voter turnout. This is significant when you consider that a party can now win the general election with as little as 22% of the total electorate, as Labour did in 2005.

If you’re ‘fortunate’ enough to live in a heavily enriched inner city area then you should not be surprised to hear your local councillors and MP’s uttering platitudes about the value and greatness of your local ethnic community, ethnic minorities vote en mass for a single party, they are therefore easier to court by prospective candidates, Labour know this, and has replaced their traditional working class voter base with invaders. This is partly due to our own apathy or disenfranchisement with the political system, the communities and local government agency revealed that 81% of the indigenous population feel powerless, unable to effect decisions. The election of two British National Party MEP’s proves that the indigenous voters can still change the political landscape; it’s a thumbs up for democracy.

Walking through the high street of any of these major cities the liberal elite expect to see the sparse indigenous inhabitants glowing with pride at their uber-enriched surroundings – In reality they look hunted, surrounded and under siege in their own country. And they are.

The British National Party exists to limit and partially reverse colonisation, a worthier cause I cannot think of, it is never wrong to resist invasion.

(For Identity Magazine)

The Pen: Mightier than the Sword

In one of today's Daily Mail articles columnist Harry Phibbs shockingly attempts to use any excuse to defame the BNP.

Writing about the 'Broken Housing System' he manages to incorporate some all too familiar anti-BNP buzzwords - it wouldn't be unreasonable to guess that journalists get paid extra for that - into a topic unrelated to "neo-Nazi[sm]", stating thus:

"Certainly the current housing allocation system has promoted resentment. Decent people have held their noses and voted for the BNP. Perhaps they are not aware when the BNP canvassers appear on the doorstep wearing suits that they are masquerading as a political party but are in reality a bunch of neo-Nazi thugs."

We can quite safely summarise from this rubbish that Harry Phibbs has never encountered BNP activists, especially the large number of BNP Second World War veterans that actually fought against the Nazis.

Little do people realise that such a constant barrage of unjustified abuse directed towards the BNP can be more harmful than first thought and this article exemplifies just how.

It refers to the way the media try to de-humanise the BNP, and by doing so allow action which otherwise would be considered unacceptable to become morally and socially acceptable, such as the abhorrent attack on Tony Ward whereby the BNP activist was struck by a claw hammer wielded by a UAF minion of David Cameron et al.

Such an attack, had it been the other way around, would have been vehemently condemned. Yet as it was a member of the "evil and subhuman BNP" who was injured people seem to find this acceptable, with many expressing their joy over social networking sites.

Ask yourselves this: have you met a BNP member/supporter? If so, are they remotely like how the media describes them?
The chances are your answer will be a profound 'no'.

We cannot allow outrageous lies like this to pass through the net without dragging the offending nonsense to the Press Complaints Commission (PCC). Every time we haul a smear before the PCC, it becomes increasingly hard for that smear to be re-published, as the PCC system warns editors in advance that the smear in question has been contested officially.

So we are calling on all our supporters to take just a few minutes to fill out the PCC online complaints form in order to put a stop to such vile, defamatory and dangerous abuse:

CLICK HERE TO VIEW OUR READY-TO-GO PCC COMPLAINTS GUIDE

Click here to view the article in question and posts your thoughts in the Comments section.

David Cameron Poster

David Cameron, Leader of the (Un)Conservative party, carbon copy of Tony Blair and supporter of communist Labour party front group Unite Against Fascism. Guilty by association of the hammer attack on British National Party activist Tony Ward.

Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

BNP's Red White and Blue (RWB) Festival Tickets on Sale Now

Tickets for the the British National Party's annual Red White and Blue festival are on sale now.

The first festival was held in 2000, this is the 10th event and should be the biggest yet.

The BNP's annual celebration of nationalist politics and British cultural heritage, the Red White & Blue 2009, will be held at the same venue in Denby Village, Derbyshire. The event will start at 12 noon on Friday 14th August and finish on the afternoon of Sunday 16th with a victory speech from Chairman Nick Griffin MEP.

This will be the tenth RWB, so we should all pull together and make it the biggest, as we all have a lot to celebrate!

Ticket prices are £35 family and £20 single person.

The RWB is for BNP members and invited guests only, tickets will be sold through the call BNP's Call Centre on 0207 078 3269.

Nick Griffin Discusses Legal Action with John Snow

Nick Griffin MEP on Channel 4.

You will notice that Simon Woolley of Operation Black Vote lets the cat out of the bag by saying: "We may want to join in order to close it down."

Equality Commission's Letter to BNP

Mr Nick Griffin
Chairman
British National Party
PO Box 14
Welshpool
SY21 0WE

Dear Mr Griffin

Letter before claim

I am writing to you as the chief legal officer of the Equality and Human Rights Commission (“the Commission”), prompted in part by your own recent references to the Race Relations Act 1976, for which we bear primary responsibility; and in part by complaints by organisations and members of the public about the constitution of your party.

For your information the Commission was established under the Equality Act of 2006 and has a statutory duty (by virtue of Section 8 of the Equality Act 2006) to encourage good practice in relation to equality and diversity, to enforce the equality enactments and to work towards the elimination of unlawful discrimination.

Background
As part of its statutory remit, the Commission from time to time monitors the actions and statements of political parties in order to assess whether their constitutions or activities may breach equality law. Preventing discrimination by political parties was one of the duties of our predecessor commissions and remains a duty of the Commission itself. The new proposals for general election voting reform have increased the importance of this duty.

Your party has recently made successful gains for the first time in a national election. This has increased public interest and scrutiny. Partly as a result of this, the Commission has received complaints from individuals about the BNP’s constitution and membership criteria.

You will understand from the above why it is the duty of the Commission to consider taking action to ensure compliance with the equality enactments although we hope that we will not need to take legal proceedings in this case.

The Commission thinks that the British National Party may be failing to comply with the Race Relations Act 1976, in several respects, relating to:

1. The BNP’s constitution and membership criteria
2. The BNP’s recruitment and employment policies, practices and procedures
3. The provision of services by elected officers to their constituents and/or members of the public

1. Constitution and membership criteria

The Commission is of the view that the constitution and membership criteria of the British National Party discriminate on racial grounds against individuals who do not fall within the membership criteria as specified in the BNP Constitution . The criteria appear to restrict membership to those within what the BNP regards as particular “ethnic groups”, and in any event restrict membership to those whose skin colour is white.

In addition to the written constitution, we note the publication of an article on the BNP official website entitled “Is the BNP racist?” which refers to “the fact that the BNP has an all white membership”.

The exclusion from membership of individuals whose ethnic origin is not listed constitutes unlawful discrimination on racial grounds (namely colour, race, nationality and ethnic and/or national origins) contrary to Section 25 of Race Relations Act 1976 which outlaws discrimination by associations.

You may be aware that, in a case on this issue funded by the Commission, the House of Lords held that political parties are ‘membership associations’ and thus are prohibited from discriminating on the grounds of race : Watt (formerly Carter) on behalf of other members of the Labour Party v Ahsan [2007] UKHL 51.

It is also unlawful for anyone to advertise unlawful membership criteria by virtue of section 29 of the Race Relations Act.

As a political party with elected representatives providing leadership within Britain, you will appreciate the importance of the BNP operating a lawful membership policy that complies both on paper and in practice with the Act.

On the basis of the current constitution and membership criteria, the Commission thinks that the BNP may have committed and may be likely to commit future unlawful acts.

The Commission therefore requires a written undertaking on behalf of the BNP that:
- the BNP will amend its constitution forthwith and in any event by no later than 1 October 2009 so as to ensure and to make transparent that it does not discriminate against potential or actual members on racial grounds, and that
- pending the adoption of the amended constitution, the BNP will not refuse membership to any individual on racial grounds.

This undertaking must be received by 16:00 on 20th July 2009.

2. Recruitment and employment policies, practices and procedures

We note that the BNP is ‘looking to recruit professional people in a number of areas’ according to the careers information on the BNP’s website. We are therefore concerned to note that the membership criteria also have application to the BNP’s standard employment application form, in that it asks job applicants to supply a membership number. In addition there does not appear to be any open advertisement of posts. This would indicate that recruitment and employment opportunities may be limited to members of the BNP.

Given the restrictions on membership, in the BNP’s capacity as an employer, the limitation of job opportunities to members of the BNP will constitute discriminatory arrangements for determining who should be offered employment contrary to section 4 of the Race Relations Act. In addition, the refusal or deliberate omission to offer employment on the basis of non-membership or any difference in treatment in the terms of employment will contravene section 4.

On the basis of the current employment application form, the Commission thinks that the BNP may have committed and may be likely to commit future unlawful acts.
The Commission therefore requires a written undertaking on behalf of the members of the BNP that:

- the BNP will not discriminate contrary to the Race Relations Act in its employment and recruitment policies, procedures and practices.

This undertaking must be received by 16:00 on 20th July 2009.

3. Provision of services by elected officers

The Commission thinks that the BNP’s elected representatives may not offer or provide services on an equal basis to their constituents and/or members of the public irrespective of race or colour.

According to a report of your speech printed in the Times on 10 June 2009, when speaking about the representation of constituents by the BNP, you stated that you: ‘would expect ethnic minorities to continue to go to the Labour party’.

Equality of service provision by all elected BNP representatives and those working or acting on their behalf is essential in order for the BNP to comply with sections 19 and 20 of Race Relations Act 1976 and paragraph 3 of the Local Authority Model Code of Conduct.

The Commission thinks that the BNP may have committed and may be likely to commit future unlawful acts.

The Commission therefore requires a written undertaking on behalf of the members of the BNP that the BNP will not discriminate on the grounds of race or colour in the provision of services to constituents and/or members of the public through or by its elected representatives or those acting on their behalf.

This undertaking must be received by 16:00 on 20th July 2009.

Pre-action Protocol

Please treat this letter as a letter before claim in accordance with County Court pre-action principles.

Action to be taken

You, or another officer so authorised, should provide written undertakings for and on behalf of the BNP and its members in respect of each of the issues 1 to 3 above, in the terms stated above, which must be received by the Commission by no later than 16:00 on 20th July 2009.

Unless we receive the required undertakings, please note that we may issue, without further notice, an application for an injunction to restrain the BNP from committing unlawful acts.

This application will be issued without prejudice to the use of any other of the Commission’s statutory enforcement powers.

It is our hope that litigation and/or enforcement action can be avoided in that your party will be willing to assure the Commission of its full compliance with the Race Relations Act.

Documents in your possession

Please forward to us any documents in your possession that are relevant to any of the issues of concern raised above.

The Claimant’s address for service

The claimant’s solicitor is: John Wadham, Group Legal Director,
The claimant’s address for service is: Equality and Human Rights Commission, 3 More London Riverside, Tooley Street, London, SE1 2RG.
Ref: JW/LE/0609/IA/1534
Telephone number: 0203 117 0235

The defendant’s address for service

The defendant’s solicitor or legal representative is: [please provide details],
The defendant’s address for service is: Mr Nick Griffin, Chairman,
British National Party, PO Box 14, Welshpool, SY21 0WE

A copy of this letter has also been sent by first class post to the BNP’s listed National Office at:

National Central Office
Admail 4148,
London
EC12A 1UY

Yours sincerely,
John Wadham
Solicitor
Group Legal Director

BNP Constitution Under Attack

Today the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has sent a letter to British National Party (BNP) Leader Nick Griffin demanding that the party alter its constitution, in particular membership criteria and employment practice.

The BNP is currently advertising for more staff with applicants expected to provide their membership number, therein lies the problem according to the EHRC. As membership is restricted to European ethnic groups they believe this may constitute an offence under the Race Relations act - which the party is legally obliged to comply with. According to anti-discrimination laws an employer cannot use non-membership to refuse an applicant a job.

Last week Nick Griffin MEP said: "The current membership qualifications for the British National Party are wholly within the law as dictated by the Race Relations Act, and nothing the Government does will change the party’s commitment to serving the interests of the indigenous population of our country."

The party has been given one month to reply, the EHRC has threatened to use litigation or enforcement action if the response is not satisfactory.

Constitutional amendments can only be carried out by members who qualify as the 'voting membership', this would mean that the party would have to call an Emergency General Meeting to consider any changes.

Nick Griffin Speech at Blackpool 2009 BNP Victory Rally

British National Party Deputy Leader Simon Darby introducing the BNP's newly elected MEP Nick Griffin.

Now the BNP are 'Climate Change Deniers'

As the European election results came into the BBC studio in the early hours of June the 7th the assembled liberal elite politicians were frothing at the mouth to denounce the British National Party (BNP). Nestled amongst the usual pejoratives was a new slur - 'Climate change deniers'.

There is a growing band of stakeholders including politicians, media elites and pressure groups who will not hear any debate on this issue, to them this global ecological disaster in the making is our fault, we must bow down, accept green taxation and never question the causes. The polar bears are dying don't you know.

Like all the smears against us this one has no basis in fact. The BNP accept that climate change is real, those of a certain age may have noticed that even the timing of the seasons are starting to shift. We haven't had our doors snowed under in decades. The party only has issue with the causes of climate change, as do over half of the worlds top climatologists/palaeoclimatologists, most geologists will laugh in your face and tell you that 2/3 degrees is nothing. This is true when you consider the temprature fluctuations over geological time.

The BNP calls for more research, we accept that human influence may be a part of the problem but may not be the main driver behind climate change, we would like to see more research and further understanding of orbital/solar forcing. This involves the study of climate indicators over a longer period of geological time, instead of just the Quaternary (2.5 MYA to present) which the pro-human influence crowd concentrate on.

If humans are found to be the driving force behind climate change through our carbon emissions then even if we could reduce these emissions tomorrow we would not see a reduction in the rate of climate change for another 80-100 years due to the time lag built into our climate systems. Peak oil, gas and coal - all expected within the first half of this century - will take the problem of carbon emissions out of our hands.

We thoroughly oppose this issue being used to send westerners on a 'guilt trip'. In 2003 a study presented to PM Blair stated that Britain could shut down its carbon emissions to zero - China would make up the difference within six months.